Skip to main content
Trump's representatives are obviously not aware of what is going on in their campaign. Talk to twelve people get fourteen answers, all different. Now, his supporters are saying that the Khan’s started this, not Donald. He attacked first. What’s going to happen if he ever becomes president (God forbid)(, when he’s riled by other leaders? Use the Red Button? (Yes. A little fear-mongering own my own). 
The actual sequence of the story, although the lemmings will deny it (they don’t read the news, just FOX). Trump has been spreading his venom against every racial type in the world (Mexicans are rapists, and criminals), (African-Americans are lazy) and more.But, he seemed to have hit the nail when he reached Muslims. He called for a ban on all Muslims. We (the sane people) all heard him, no? Now, his spokespeople say that didn’t happen, even though he said it on TV. They state on TV (Bloomberg Report) he never wanted a ban on Muslims, just people from certain countries that support terrorism. They pontificate it was media that reported it wrong. 
The proposed ban, later with calls to kick out ALL Muslims in this country, is what infuriated the Khans. Trump supporters say no. They were Trump’s own words. To these revisionists of history - somehow you must know the truth, and are simply embarrassing yourselves to get a paycheck now. 
The fact is, it was Trump who attacked the Khans. And, it’s Trump who’s keeping this small story going by adding new attacks daily. 
Hillary Clinton took the higher road of respect, not attack, when Patricia Smith spoke at the Republican Convention, saying she held Clinton “personally responsible” for her son Sean’s death. She said Clinton should be in stripes, against radicalized shouts of “Lock her up!” Of course, Trump supporters will deny that happened.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Education is the key to civility

Republicans have been in a “war” against public education for many decades; invariably against funding to support America’s most vital institution(s).  Techniques are to oppose state and Federal  initiatives to decrease taxes spent to support public schooling in states under their control; encourage charter schools owned by wealthy, private Republican donors; supporting anti-education individuals to “run” the State and Federal systems (DeVoss?); allow absurd tuition increases; closing schools in desperately needed areas; cutting educators’ salaries; lacking raises, pensions,  maintenance, supply, extracurricular activities, new books and supportive materials; and, much more. They profess their “support” of education; even falsely claiming to be the “party of education.” This includes K-12, H.S. and College/University levels.  Schoolbooks, such as those produced primarily by the Texas Republican State Board of Education, deny mention of significant historic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Babyman has a conniption fit

There is no there with the Tyrant-in-Charge of our new autocracy. He usurped the Senate by taking over supervision of Mitch McConnell, as he did to Paul Ryan, a man who turned into a eunuch under Trump. I wonder what Trump’s offered these members of the Sycophant Party? Pelosi used her authority to determine risk in presenting the State of the Union, saying he could submit it in writing, the usual procedure until the 1970s. Babyman had a conniption fit, canceling Pelosi ’s plane ride to Afghanistan, offering support to our military, and gaining vital information from the front lines. This trip was to understand the issues better, an opportunity always allowed to Congressional leaders.  He claimed it was due to the shutdown and just a publicity tour. However, that didn’t keep him from a photo op trip to Iraq or allowing a Republican delegation to go, or allowing Melania to fly to Mar-a-Lago, on U.S. aircraft, all during the shutdown.
Post a Comment
Read more
I still have some people - not many - who support trump, as it turns out. Even those of my persuasion. They think trump is good for the U.S. because he supports Israel. I agree, that's great. And, despite what trump created with Obama's being a Muslim, born in Kenya, even Obama was supportive of Israel. Netanyahu was rude to Obama, even during the campaign which people forget about, and still, Obama was kind a respectful.  AGAIN, I say, trump's decision to back out of the Iranian deal would allow Iran to return to their Nuclear dreams, which is NOT good for Israel or the U.S. They would firstTHREATEN Israel often and Blackmail the U.S. That is common sense when you take time to think about it.
Post a Comment
Read more